Search

 

Society of Wedding and Portrait Photographers - SWPP and BPPAClick here to join today

Monday 1st December 2008  GMT 


ARTICLES  Architectural  Business Practices  Children Photography  Colour & Calibration  Corel Painter  Digital Imaging  Fashion & Glamour  Infared  Landscape  Light  Mathieson  Monochrome  Paper Chase  Photo Projects  Photo Techniques  Photoshop  Portraits  Sport  Studio Profiles  SWPP & BPPA  Web Design  Weddings   NEWS & REVIEWS  Latest News  Albums & Preview Books  Camera Accessories  Cameras  Computers & Software  Corporate  Lenses  Lighting Equipment  Other  Photographic Laboratory  Printers & Papers  Storage  Websites   OTHER LANGUAGES  Denmark  Deutsch  Dutch  Espanol  Finnish  Francais  Greek  Hungarian  Italiano  Norwegian  Latvian  Russian   RSS Feeds RSS Feed RSS Feeds  

 


Click here to find out more

Eizo coloredge cg241W monitor

Page 2

Is it worth it? It has to be said that as we go about the country we come across some pretty ghastly monitors. All in the lower price bracket tend to be massively over bright, designed, as they are, with the gamers in mind. When you attempt to drop the brightness back (typically from 350cd/m2 to 95cd/m2) they either will not do so, (because they don’t have user-adjustable Look-up Tables (LUTs) at all), lose accuracy or, in the worst instances we have seen, posterise and band the image. A few we have attempted to calibrate were totally compromised by attempting to calibrate them, with huge swathes of banded tones across dark hair for example – we are not talking poor here, we mean ghastly, unacceptably ghastly! By the same token we can find you a number of members who are operating Dell UltraSharps as a successful part of their workflow. In the main these users have mentally adjusted to the mismatch between screen and print and got on with it.

In summary then, your extra money buys a larger screen, higher resolution, a larger gamut and an accurately controlled luminance and colour temperature. If your budget is limited you are better going for a physically smaller model and pairing it with a lower cost (£100) second monitor to hold your Photoshop palettes and create more desktop area (of monitor that is). At 24 inches the CG241W is pushing the limits; with a close working distance the angle to the outer edges is quite acute and there is a detectable difference in the appearance of the image. In real terms you see about 10 or 15 more RGB points of separation in deep shadows by moving your head to the side of the screen. A second, separate monitor can be placed at an angle to the primary screen, so that your eye-to-screen distance is maintained. A counter argument to this is that you can sit further away from a larger monitor.

Color Navigator

This software is a dream to use. The instruction leaflet is a masterpiece of brevity – ‘Follow the onscreen instructions’. That indeed is what you do, and seven mouse clicks later you should find yourself in front of a calibrated screen. We aimed at 6500°K and got 6509°K, a luminance of 95cd/m2 and got 95.1cd/m2. After saving the profile you can lock the setting down and let Fido off his lead – there’s nothing more to do!

Performance

The Color Navigator profile was not recognised by our X-Rite evaluation program and so we had to build a bespoke profile using Monaco profiler. As shown in the table, this delivered the highest gamut volume that we have measured to date off any device of any kind – the bar keeps rising. The screen grabs show the actual gamut in relation to Adobe RGB and FOGRA CMYK profiles. Although Eizo claim a 96% coverage of Adobe RGB we actually exceed it, we obviously had a monitor from the higher end of the variability scale. The Adobe RGB gamut was exceeded in the oranges, reds and cyans and (just) in the blues. Apart from a single value, the Eizo gamut swallowed the entire FOGRA gamut. Overall these data were very close to those obtained earlier in the year on the Eizo CG221.

The colour precision values were not quite as high as we anticipated from our results with the CG221 but at 1.76 ΔE Lab/1.29ΔE 2000 they would be considered a ‘match’. We tried a number of dodges to improve the values but failed to do so. There was a slight warmth to the neutral greys which showed when viewing monochrome images and also shows in the plotted data. The error data became more neutral after an overnight restart, but then we found that the luminance component had shifted to create the largest error portion. This amounted to about 2.5% too dark over the Macbeth swatches. We thought about hand tweaking the settings but got that ‘only touch that button if you think you’re hard enough’ look from Fido!

The Achilles' heel of the mid-range LCDs is their luminance control as we have said, and their inability to operate at the ISO standard of 95 cd/m2. In practice this usually means that you see more in the shadows of an on-screen image than a well-profiled inkjet printer will deliver. The Eizo displayed shadow blocking at between 15 and 20 RGB points, just where it happens in a paper print – an excellent result, then.

The electronics of the CG241W include a 12-bit LUT, giving a palette of 4,081 for each of the red, green and blue tones. The quality of the Granger Chart is very smooth with no obvious flaws or discontinuities. It is not reproduced here because, by definition, it is almost 100% out of gamut in CMYK printing. The monitor also features Digital Uniformity Equalisation (DUE) which smoothes out any differences in luminance across the screen and out to the corners. Every monitor is provided with the actual quality control chart, displaying the measured (small) errors across the entire screen.

TOP: The seven-click Color Navigator dialogue is simplicity itself, a joy to use.
MIDDLE: The gamut volume measurement broke the record.
BOTTOM: The gamut is similar in size to Adobe RGB, exceeding its reach in quite a few places. This extended gamut is what marks these high-end
monitors out from the lower-priced competition.

TOP: The gamut of the Eizo 241W swallows all parts of the FOGRA CMYK printing gamut, essential for truly accurate rendition of printing
colours on the screen.
MIDDLE: The usual audit of the Macbeth Chart colours shows very small overall errors.
BOTTOM: The residual error left the rendering of monochromes just a little warm, as confirmed by this graph. The data points from the Macbeth greys are a couple of points into the right quadrants of the Lab chart, ie warmer.

OVERALL We remain impressed by the Eizo technology in their high-end monitors and would take the decision to invest the extra simply for peace of mind. The ease of calibration, the accuracy of that calibration and the five-year warranty all make for a package that is worth paying extra for. The decision on size is trickier; our own preference would be for a smaller screen, combined with an inexpensive second screen. If, however, you need colour precision across the full 24-inch diagonal then this is a good way of achieving it.

The CG241W costs £1,149.00 ex VAT and not including a calibration device.
See also
www.eizo.com
www.colourconfidence.com

Page 1 - Page 2

 

Best of Adobe Photoshop

Photo Quote: Light glorifies everything. It transforms and ennobles the most commonplace and ordinary subjects. The object is nothing; light is everything. - Leonard Misonne