Photographic Exhibition

 

Society of Wedding and Portrait Photographers - SWPP and BPPAscreen protectors

Sunday 20th July 2008  GMT 


ARTICLES  Architectural  Business Practices  Children Photography  Colour & Calibration  Corel Painter  Digital Imaging  Fashion & Glamour  Infared  Landscape  Light  Mathieson  Monochrome  Paper Chase  Photo Projects  Photo Techniques  Photoshop  Portraits  Sport  Studio Profiles  SWPP & BPPA  Web Design  Weddings   NEWS & REVIEWS  Latest News  Albums & Preview Books  Camera Accessories  Cameras  Computers & Software  Corporate  Lenses  Lighting Equipment  Other  Photographic Laboratory  Printers & Papers  Storage  Websites   OTHER LANGUAGES  Deutsch  Francais  Espanol  Germany  Italiano  Denmark  The Netherlands   RSS Feeds RSS Feed RSS Feeds  

Submit a profile on you and your studio

 


portrait professional Click here to find out more

Norman Phillips on Legal

Norman Phillips PiCTURE THIS. Your client makes an appointment to have her portrait made with her three children as a gift for her husband’s 40th birthday. She meets with you for a consultation so as to be properly prepared for this important event. Resulting from this meeting she shops to acquire the appropriate clothing for the children and herself. The appointment was deliberately made to allow her time at the beauty parlour for her and her two daughters, seven years and nine years old.

While she is at the beauty parlour she has a baby sitter take care of her four-year-old son and arranges for her to deliver the boy to the studio where all four of them will be dressed. In effect, she has invested not only considerable dollars in clothing and beauty parlour charges; she has invested the best part of two days of her time.

 The woman is very excited about the session and so are the children. This is going to be a big surprise for daddy and the children have vouched not to let on what’s being planned.

 They arrive for the session and it seems that all goes well. The children enjoy the session as you are a very nice friendly photographer and they leave with great expectations. The potential problem is that the timing of the session and the date of dad’s birthday puts a little pressure on you to be on time with not only proofing but also the finished product.

When you process the portraits you discover that there are serious technical issues and the only way you can deliver on the promise of the finished portrait is to have them back for a retake. But there is not enough time for this to be arranged and deliver finished product in time.

 Nevertheless, you call her and tell her the bad news. She is obviously very upset and is in a panic. Her well-planned gift is not going to happen. She declines the invitation for a retake for all the obvious reasons. You apologise profusely but she is not consoled and you do what is the obvious and offer her a refund, which she accepts. That, hopefully, other than the potential bad public relations is the end of it no matter how regrettable.

 A few weeks later you receive a letter from the ex client’s attorney. It demands that you reimburse her for her expenses and disappointment in the amount of £5,000. When you have consulted your own attorney you take his advice and send her a cheque. To argue the point would be more expensive, especially if she should sue.

This scenario begs the question. Did you have a written portrait contract with this client? You will reply no and that you would never have thought about such a thing and as far as you know no one amongst your professional colleagues has one either. And you are probably right. Virtually no one in the professional portrait business has a portrait contract.

Few professional photographers ever give the legal side of their business much thought. When they do they retreat from the legal protections they need in fear of rejection by potential clients. Wedding photographers are especially at risk because the overwhelming majority use documents that are intended as legal commitments between themselves and their clients that are so flawed they would be better off without the socalled ‘contract’.

In today’s litigious environment the legal aspects of our business requires our special attention because what appears to be an innocuous relationship can readily turn very nasty and we can quickly be in the poor house. There are so many situations that we should have effective legal redress and protection for that we all need to seriously review how we do business.

 Being something of an amateur lawyer I have always written my own forms and contracts. Then I had my attorney review them to ensure that I was on the right track. My wedding contract had always been something of a model for my professional colleagues and some years ago resulting from an article I wrote for a leading magazine I sent out almost 1,000 copies to photographers across the country for $2 plus their postage return envelope. But in early 2004, due to the rapid changes in the way we create images I made some changes to the contract and sent it to Chris Nudo, my attorney for his review. Chris did much more than review the document. He researched the industry and reviewed contracts that were being advocated by leading associations and publishers and he also reviewed photography legal books too. His conclusion was that my contract was by far the best though it still could do with some work. Not only did Chris conclude that my contract was by far the best he stated that there was not another contract he had reviewed that he could recommend.

 When we began discussing this issue we decided to conduct a comprehensive review of all the documents that were being advocated to photographers. This research brought us to the decision to write a book for the use of professional photographers in the disciplines of weddings (event), portraits, and fine art, commercial and related aspects of those areas of our business. We set out to create the best advice and recommendations that would be available. The book took six months to complete. It is primarily based on Illinois law but has pertinent relevance to any photographer in any state and any country.

The book, “Wedding and Portrait Photographers Legal Handbook” arrived in December 2004. It is published by Amherst Media, an exclusive publisher of photography books. The excitement about the book is considerable. It has been described as the book every photographer should own.

 Admittedly, as I was the primary contributor for the book and responsible for identifying all the issues we should cover I am biased, so my recommendation needs to be seen in that light. I have written three other books (the third arrives on the bookshelves this summer) and am in the process of writing three others. They are all about the technique of photography, but though I am happy with them I sincerely believe that this legal book is my most important contribution to the industry and when you review it you will see its important relevance to our wellbeing.

I truly believe that you need this book if you are not an attorney. The potential for serious litigation in so many areas of our business means we need to create a legal barrier between potential financial ruin and us. NORMAN PHILLIPS on legal – WHAT’S YOUR LEGAL STATUS? FSWPP & 25 If I were to have one pound for each time someone asked me at seminars and presentations how much I charge for my portraits and wedding photography I might have enough to for a down payment for something really valuable.

Find books by Norman Phillips

 

infoserve

Photo Quote: Photographs are perhaps the most mysterious of all the objects that make up, and thicken, the environment we recognize as modern. Photographs really are experience captured, and the camera is the ideal arm of consciousness in its acquisitive mood.- Susan Sontag